Public HearingTuesday, June 23, 2026 · 4:00 PM · Council Chambers
← Back to home
Resources

Questions, terms, and the source documents.

Honest answers to the hardest objections, a plain-language glossary of the planning terms used on this site, and links to every primary document this case is built on.

Difficult questions

Honest answers to the obvious objections.

Doesn’t Kelowna need more housing? Isn’t this just NIMBYism?

Kelowna does need housing, and Gordon Drive can be part of that. The existing zoning combined with provincial Bill 44 already permits substantial additional housing here without rezoning — the applicant’s own analysis says up to 64 units.

The question is not “housing or no housing.” It is whether to grant a discretionary OCP amendment to a proposal that funnels 65 households onto a school-frontage arterial through one unsafe access point, in exchange for no public benefit. That is a planning question.

I don’t live on Gordon Drive — why does this affect me?

Gordon Drive is the arterial the Upper Mission and South Kelowna depend on every weekday morning. The bottleneck at this stretch already produces “dangerous” merge conditions at 8:30 AM, before this development adds anything. If you drive Gordon Drive at commute times, this affects you — and your written submission carries the same weight as a resident’s.

The owners may not even build it — isn’t this premature?

Whether construction is imminent is the wrong question. The OCP amendment and rezoning attach to the land permanently. Once adopted, any owner can build up to 65 units, and the Development Permit stage that follows is largely procedural. The neighbourhood’s only opportunity to weigh in is now.

What about provincial housing rules — doesn’t this rezoning have to happen?

No. Bill 44 requires the City to permit up to four small-scale units on most lots — already met by the existing zoning. The OCP amendment and rezoning are not required by provincial law. They are discretionary decisions that go above what the Province mandates.

What would the neighbourhood actually support?

Thoughtful development that respects the three principles: safety, sensitive transition, and contribution. Appropriate density and form for the street, safe vehicle access like the curb extension required of the neighbouring strata, a complete traffic study covering both peaks during a regular school week, and a real public benefit. Thoughtful densification, yes. Skipping the steps the City’s own policy requires, no.

If staff recommend approval, doesn’t that mean it’s a good proposal?

Staff recommendation is one input. Under the Local Government Act, Council weighs it against the broader public interest and the City’s own policies. Council is not bound by the staff recommendation and exercises its own judgment on each application.

Reference

The terms used on this site.

OCP Official Community Plan
The City’s long-range land-use plan. Required by s.472 of the BC Local Government Act.
S-RES Suburban Residential
The current OCP designation for the site. Suburban-scale residential consistent with the surrounding neighbourhood.
S-MU Suburban Multiple Unit
The proposed designation. Higher-density ground-oriented housing such as townhouses.
RU1 Large Lot Housing
The current zoning. Single-family plus, under Bill 44, up to four small-scale units per lot.
MF2 Townhouse Housing
The proposed zoning. Multi-unit ground-oriented housing at substantially higher density than RU1.
Bill 44 SSMUH Act, 2023
Requires most BC municipalities to allow up to four small-scale units per lot without rezoning.
Development Permit DP
The approval covering site design and building form, issued after rezoning. Largely procedural at that stage.
Public Hearing
The Council meeting where OCP and zoning amendments are considered. For this file: June 23, 2026 at 4:00 PM.
Sensitive transition
OCP Policy 7.2.1 language requiring larger buildings to step height and massing down toward lower-density neighbours.
Setback
The minimum distance between a building and the property line. Proposed townhouse setback from the OKM fence is about 4.5 metres.
Primary sources

Read it yourself.

Every claim on this site is drawn from public City documents, the applicant’s own materials, or BC statute. The file number is OCP25-0023 / Z25-0053.

Take action

Write to Council.

Tell Council that Gordon Drive deserves development that is safe, properly studied, and fits the neighbourhood. A short personal letter carries more weight than any petition signature.

Write to Council
Letters must reach the City Clerk before 4:00 PM, Monday June 22.